Comparative Analysis of Austin & Searle's Speech Act Theories<Tab/>
Title: Comparative Analysis of Austin & Searle's Speech Act Theories<Tab/>
Category: /Social Sciences/Language & Speech
Details: Words: 3148 | Pages: 11 (approximately 235 words/page)
Comparative Analysis of Austin & Searle's Speech Act Theories<Tab/>
Category: /Social Sciences/Language & Speech
Details: Words: 3148 | Pages: 11 (approximately 235 words/page)
Speech-act theory was elaborated by Austin J. L., a linguist philosopher; this theory was the reaction of Austin and his coworkers in opposition to the so-called logical positivist philosophers of language. Austin in contrasts to logical positivism that could be assessed in terms of 'truth' and 'falsity' ('known as truth conditional semantics'), was keen on the way regular people use language in everyday situations. Moreover, he was persuaded that we do not use language to
showed first 75 words of 3148 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 3148 total
force, the predictive power of certain speech acts and substantial amount of background experience and knowledge of different linguistic forms and socio-cultural variants. In other words, a complex analysis of discourse coherence.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.Brown, G. & G. Yule. (1996). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
2.Coulthard, M. (1996). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. New York:Longman.
3.Stubbs, M. (1998). Discourse Analysis. The Sociolinguistic Analysis of NaturalLanguage. Oxford: Blackwell.
4.Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction. An Introduction to Pragmatics. NewYork: Longaman.