The Doctrine of the pre-emptive self-defense of George Bush

"....Given the goals of rogue states and terrorists, the United States can no longer solely rely on a reactive posture as we have in the past. The inability to deter a potential attacker, the immediacy of today's threats, and the magnitude of potential harm that could be caused by our adversaries' choice of weapons, do not permit that option. We cannot let our enemies strike first....The United States has long maintained the option of …showed first 75 words of 2356 total…

…showed last 75 words of 2356 total…to the interests and desires of a certain country or authority, but once again, it does not mean that it can justify the violence of international law. If every government makes up definitions in order to defend their interests, than the existing international laws lose their actuality and the humanity will end up living in the world where any country feels free to attacks another one without giving any explanations. <Tab/>